13th International Congress
THE "NEW FRONTIERS"
OF ARRHYTHMIAS 1998

January 24-31, 1998
Marilleva, Trento, Italy

RT-24

Significant reduction of atrial floating pacing capture thresholds using a conventional monophasic impulse and a novel pacing electrode configuration.
First results

W.M. Hartung, D. Hartung, A. Auricchio, C. Geller, A. Goette, H.-D. Esperer, S. Hobrack, H. Klein.
University Hospital Magdeburg, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Magdeburg, Germany

Abstract

Single lead, dual-chamber pacing using floating atrial ring electrodes and a conventional monophasic impulse configuration is limited by unacceptably high atrial capture thresholds. Our recently described "Overlapping Biphasic Impulse" (OLBI)-stimulation technique is able to reduce atrial floating capture thresholds significantly. We further developed a new pacing configuration applying a conventional impulse between three electrodes delivered bidirectionaly (Bidirectional Monophasic Impulse or BIMOS).
Methods. In 6 female mini-pigs (27.5 ± 3.5 kg), a modified single-VDD-lead with three atrial electrodes (interelectrode distance 10 mm) was introduced under fluoroscopic control so that the ring electrodes were floating in the mid right atrium. Atrial capture thresholds (ACT) using BIMOS pacing were compared to conventional bipolar (BI) and unipolar (UI) pacing with identical pulse durations of 0.5 ms. The BIMOS configuration was then tested in 28 patients (14 women, 14 men, mean age 56 ± 14 years) during a routine EP-study. A conventional quadripolar electrode catheter was inserted into the right atrium with the ring electrodes floating in the high and mid-level of the right atrium. ACTs with BIMOS configuration were compared with ACTs during UI and BI pacing.
Results. In the animal model, the mean ACT during BIMOS configuration was significantly lower than during UI (1.8 V vs 1.1 V, p < 0.05) and BI pacing (1.6 V vs 1.1 V, p < 0.05). In the patient study, the mean ACT with BIMOS configuration was again significantly lower compared to UI (3.8 V vs 2.3 V, p < 0.05) or BI pacing (3.5 V vs 2.3 V, p < 0.05).
Conclusion. Because of a significant reduction in atrial capture thresholds the novel BIMOS-stimulation concept seems to be superior for atrial floating pacing. Therefore, BIMOS may be useful for future single-lead DDD pacemaker systems.

Key Words

Pacing
electrode configuration, DDD pacemakers, OA

 

forward

CARDIOnet® - registered trade mark name
Copyright © 1996-1998 by CARDIOnet. All rights reserved.