13th International Congress
THE "NEW FRONTIERS"
OF ARRHYTHMIAS 1998

January 24-31, 1998
Marilleva, Trento, Italy

RT-25

Atrial stimulation by means of floating electrodes: evaluation of different pacing configurations

Matteo Di Biase, Giovanni Luzzi, Matteo Anaclerio, Daniela Casella, Maria Vittoria Pitzalis, Paolo Rizzon.
Istituto di Cardiologia, Universita degli Studi, Bari, Italy

Abstract

Background. The major limitation to the widespread use of DDD pacing utilizing a single lead with floating atrial dipole is the parasitic stimulation of the phrenic nerve and the consequent diaphragmatic contraction, which is an intolerable side effect. The reduction of diaphragmatic stimulation incidence could be achieved by maximizing the difference between atrial and diaphragmatic thresholds mainly by lowering the atrial threshold utilizing different pacing configurations. In this study, 4 different pacing configurations were tested with the 830-S PHYMOS lead.
Subjects and methods. During pacemaker implantation of 14 patients with atrioventricular block of different degrees and sites, atrial and diaphragmatic thresholds were tested utilizing 4 different pacing configurations: A = monopolar via proximal electrode; B = monopolar via distal electrode; C = bipolar with proximal electrode as a negative one; D = bipolar with distal electrode as a negative one.
Results. Pacing configuration C was associated with atrial capture in all patients and showed the lowest incidence of diaphragmatic contraction and the highest difference between atrial and diaphragmatic thresholds (4 V), with mean values of 2.6 ± 0.64 and 6.8 ± 1.5 V, respectively.
Conclusions. Utilizing a 830-S PHYMOS lead, a bipolar atrial stimulation, with proximal floating electrode as negative, is associated with the lowest atrial pacing threshold, the highest difference between atrial and diaphragmatic thresholds and the highest incidence of atrial capture. A careful set up of an implanted pacemaker could be helpful in avoiding diaphragmatic stimulation by utilizing the difference in atrial and diaphragmatic thresholds.

Key Words

Pacing
electrode configuration, DDD pacemakers, OA

 

forward

CARDIOnet® - registered trade mark name
Copyright © 1996-1998 by CARDIOnet. All rights reserved.