|
Our knowledge of the electrophysiologic substrate for
initiation of atrial fibrillation in patients is still very limited. Evidence that atrial
electrical remodeling due to atrial fibrillation itself may also occur in patients is
infered from several clinical observations: 1) paroxysmal atrial fibrillation often
progresses to chronic atrial fibrillation; 2) longer duration of fibrillation episodes
facilitates transition to the chronic form; 3) lower success rate of chemical or
electrical cardioversion after longer duration of atrial fibrillation. One may argue that
these observations can be explained by progression of the underlying disease. However,
similar observations have been obtained in patients with idiopathic atrial fibrillation.
It seems likely that in some categories of patients atrial fibrillation begets atrial
fibrillation is the most important mechanism, whereas in others progression of structural
disease may contribute importantly. Finally, recent observations in chronic fibrillating
goat atria showed histologic changes5. Thus, the
arrhythmia may become the cause of structural changes.
From animal experiments discussed above, we know that shortening of the refractory
period by sustained atrial fibrillation promotes perpetuation of the arrhythmia. This
shortening also facilitates its initiation. From other animal experiments we know that
conduction block is crucial for initiation. In vitro observations in human atria showed
similar results6. Superfused strips of the right atrial
appendage from patients with chronic atrial fibrillation showed a shorter refractory
period and a significantly greater dispersion in atrial refractory period than from
patients without this arrhythmia.
Ramdat Misier and coworkers7 studied the substrate
for atrial fibrillation in patients in vivo during cardiac surgery. These authors used
atrial fibrillation intervals as index of atrial refractoriness. Intervals were measured
from multiple epicardial sites. To exclude other causes of atrial fibrillation only
patients with idiopathic atrial fibrillation and a control group were included. Both,
shorter refractoriness and a larger dispersion of refractoriness were found in the atrial
fibrillation group. This is an important study. However, appropriate interpretation of the
results is hampered by several limitations. Since the time of onset of the episode of
atrial fibrillation used for the measurements is not reported, nor the incidence of the
arrhythmia, we are not informed about the contribution of electrical remodeling. In
addition, the study group was rather small and the patients were studied under rather
unphysiologic conditions during cardiac surgery and under general anesthesia.
|