Diran Igidbashian*, Patrizio
Mazzone, Mariano Rillo, Maria Luisa Loricchio, Carlo Pappone.
Department of Cardiology, S. Raffaele Hospital, Milan,
*Department of Cardiology, Civil Hospital, Legnago, Italy
|
|
Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is one of the most
common forms of sustained arrhythmias and represents an important management problem1-3 because of the usually alarming onset of symptoms, the
disability these produce, specially in the setting of an underlying heart disease, and the
sometimes unsatisfactory results, or possible deleterious effects4,5,
of drug therapy.
Radiofrequency ablation of the atrio-ventricular junction6,7,
followed by the implantation of an automatic mode switching DDD/DDDR dual chamber
pacemaker8,9, is an accepted treatment for therapy
resistant paroxysmal atrial fibrillation10.
A number of studies have demonstrated that in the presence of atrial fibrillation with
rapid or difficult to control ventricular response, particularly if associated with
congestive heart failure, radiofrequency ablation of the atrio-ventricular junction and
the implantation of a pacemaker leads to a reduction of physical limitations, to an
improvement of the quality of life, of the functional class and of the left ventricular
ejection fraction10-15. While some of these studies
have comparatively analysed possible contributing factors, none seem to have taken into
consideration a possible role of the pacing mode (DDD or DDDR) and in particular of the
influence of the rate responsive function, specially regarding atrial fibrillation
prevention. It was therefore decided to conduct a randomised, crossover, pilot study to
evaluate the effects of DDD versus DDDR pacing modes of an automatic mode-switching double
chamber device, in a patient population referred for radiofrequency ablation of the
atrio-ventricular junction and permanent dual chamber stimulation as a treatment of
hemodynamically ill-tolerated, rapid ventricular response, drug-resistant, paroxysmal
atrial fibrillation.
|