RT-185
|
Internal low energy
cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: patients' tolerance employing a step-up protocol
|
|
|
Giuseppe Boriani, Mauro Biffi,
Gabriele Bronzetti, Francesco Pergolini, Romano Zannoli, °Gregory M. Ayers, Alessandro
Capucci, Angelo Branzi, Bruno Magnani.
Institute of Cardiology, Bologna, Italy, °In Control Inc, Redmond, WA, USA
|
|
Introduction
|
|
External cardioversion is usually employed for
restoring sinus rhythm in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation but general
anesthesia is required for this procedure.
Transvenous internal atrial cardioversion has been initially studied in animal models1 in order to find the optimal waveform and the optimal
defibrillating leads location. Cooper et al1 studied
internal cardioversion in sheep, comparing different symmetrical monophasic and biphasic
waveforms and varying defibrillating leads locations. In this study the 3/3 msec biphasic
waveform had significantly lower energy requirements than longer biphasic or monophasic
symmetrical waveforms. In the same paper, comparing different internal lead systems with
catheters positioned in right atrial appendage, superior vena cava, coronary sinus or left
pulmonary artery, in various combinations, the most effective lead system resulted to be
that including a lead in the right atrial appendage and another lead in distal coronary
sinus with a right to left orientation1.
In animal models also the issue of ventricular proarrhythmia has been studied2. Ayers et al2 found
that the risk of inducing a ventricular tachyarrhythmia was associated with a cycle length
preceding shock delivery < 300 msec while when the cycle length preceding the
shock was longer than 300 msec no ventricular arrhythmias were observed.
In addition to animal studies, more recently transvenous internal atrial cardioversion
has been evaluated also in humans, specifically patients with paroxysmal or induced atrial
fibrillation3,4 or in patients with chronic atrial
fibrillation4-6. In transvenous internal atrial
cardioversion, shock is applied directly to fibrillating regions, thus the procedure may
be effective even in patients with long standing chronic atrial fibrillation and even
despite previous ineffective transthoracic shocks6-8.
In patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation internal atrial
cardioversion can be effective at relatively low energies and thus can be performed
without general anesthesia. In previous reports5-8
intravenous sedation has been usually administered before shock delivery for reducing
shock-induced discomfort.
The aim of the present study was to assess efficacy, safety and patients' tolerability
of low energy internal atrial cardioversion in an unselected group of patients, mainly
with chronic persistent atrial fibrillation.
|