S-165
|
Dual-chamber ICD indications:
present and future
|
|
|
P.E. Vardas.
Cardiology Department, University Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece
|
|
|
|
Automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator
devices undoubtedly represent one of the major technological breakthroughs in the last two
decades for the treatment of cardiac rhythm disorders. Today's devices are capable of low
energy cardioversion, antitachycardia pacing and defibrillation, together with
antibradycardia pacing and sensing in the ventricle. The recording of the internal
electrogram and the ability of these devices to function as an internal Holter monitor
allows the cardiologist to check on the device's performance and to make any necessary
adjustments in the programming.
However, this self checking capacity has revealed one of the main limitations of ICDs,
namely, their lack of specificity in the detection of ventricular tachycardia. False
pos-itive detection of atrial tachyarrhythmias with a fast ventricular response as
ventricular tachyarrhythmias can lead to inappropriate electrical therapy. In fact, such
inappropriate therapy for documented non-ventricular rhythm has been documented in up to
41% of all patients treated with an ICD, sometimes with serious complications.
The vast majority of arrhythmia episodes leading to inadequate defibrillator therapy
are caused by paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) with a fast ventricular response.
Although many algorithms have been developed to deal with this arrhythmia, they all suffer
from the limitation of being based only on ventricular sensing, which leads to
deficiencies in accuracy and specificity. Thus, dual-chamber sensing is an obvious
approach to the problem. A device with the ability to sense and pace in both ventricle and
atrium, as well as performing cardioversion and defibrillation in the ventricle, offers
clear advantages over conventional ICDs1. The
dual-chamber ICDs available at present, apart from delivering electrical therapy to the
ventricle, are also capable of pacing and sensing in both ventricle and atrium. Some
dual-chamber ICD devices can also deliver defibrillatory shocks to the atrium.
The electrical benefits of dual-chamber ICD systems are as follows2:
* they allow both atrial and atrioventricular pacing;
* they can discriminate better between supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias3,4;
* interactions between dual-chamber pacemaker and ICD are reduced;
* atrial pacing may be used to prevent AF;
* atrial or dual-chamber defibrillation are both possible.
It is also possible that atrioventricular pacing may improve the haemodynamic function
in patients with compromised left ventricular function.
|
Key Words
|
|
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator – new
perspectives
dual chamber ICD, low energy cardioversion, antitachycardia pacing, defibrillation,
antibradycardia pacing, atrial pacing, atrioventricualr pacing, atrial sensing-pacing,
paroxysmal AF, ventricualr tachycardia/fibrillation, sudden cardiac death, R
|