|
Currently to overcome the problem of inappropriate
shocks for supraventricular arrhythmias the ICD devices have been loaded with several
features including onset, stability, electrogram configuration and hemodynamic sensing
criteria. Recently it has been suggested that incorporation of atrial electrogram
monitoring and analysis of AV association allow sensitive and specific differentiation
between ventricular and supraventricular tachycardia9,10.
In a study performed by Nair et al11, a new algorithm
including such a feature with dual chamber sensing ICD device (Defender 9001, Ela Medical)
has been tested. The algorithm uses atrial and ventricular signals and performs a tiered
analysis of arrhythmia in three steps: 1. cycle length sorting, 2. majority rhythm
identification and 3. VT/SVT/ST sorting. Importantly four criteria have been used for
detection and classification of tachy-arrhythmias in this algorithm namely ventricular
rate, stability of RR intervals, type of AV association, acceleration magnitude and
origin. The type of AV association has been used to differentiate VT and SVT in such a way
that a stable ventricular rhythm without AV association is identified as VT and a stable
ventricular rhythm with N: 1 association is defined as SVT. This algorithm was evaluated
in 156 episodes of induced sustained tachycardias including SVT, atrial flutter, atrial
fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia, flutter and fibrillation. The algorithm correctly
diagnosed 96% of ventricular tachycardia episodes, 100% of ventricular fibrillation
episodes and 92% of double tachycardia episodes (VT/VF associated with atrial flutter or
fibrillation). The positive predictive value for the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation and
flutter were 92% and 86%, respectively. In another study the same algorithm was used to
evaluate the performance in discriminating the sinus rhythm. Twenty-four episodes of sinus
tachycardia have been documented and in all cases the diagnosis was correct and no therapy
was delivered.
|