![]() |
![]() |
14th International Congress
|
RT-210 |
New concepts of dual-chamber or biventricular pacing therapy in patients with life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias |
||||||||||||
Hans-Joachim Trappe, Michael Achtelik, Petra Pfitzner, Bernward Voigt, Peter Weismüller.
|
|||||||||||||
Introduction |
|||||||||||||
Sudden cardiac death is one of the major causes of mortality in western countries with an incidence of approximately 450.000 victims per year in the United States and 100000 sudden death patients per year in Germany1. Multiple pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapeutic options are currently available for the treatment of patients who have survived previous episodes of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias2,3. Disappointing results with antiarrhythmic agents, including class III drugs, as well as encouraging results from some implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) trials have led to nonpharmacologic alternatives gaining increased acceptance as a treatment for patients with this pathology4-6. Furthermore, subsequent to the introduction of the concept of the ICD, there have been many technologic innovations that have permitted vast improvements in therapy options and diagnostic features7. Technical innovations have allowed precipitous reductions in pulse generator volume and mass without sacrificing longevity or clinical effectiveness8. Recently, ICDs with dual-chamber pacing, sensors for rate-adaptive pacing and biventricular pacing possibilities have been introduced in clinical cardiology to allow atrioventricular and biventricular synchrony with an improved cardiac output9,10.
TABLE I–Indications for dual-chamber pacing in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients
AV=atrioventricular, DDDR-dual chamber pacing with rate responsive mode
TABLE II–Patient characteristics of DDD-ICD recipients |
|||||||||||||
Pt |
Age |
Sex |
Dis |
T-Arr |
SVA-Arr |
EF |
NYHA |
DFT |
ICD-Typ |
1 |
69 |
m |
CAD |
SMVT |
SSS |
57% |
II |
8 J. |
Ventak AV |
2 |
69 |
m |
CAD |
SMVT |
AV II |
41% |
III |
12 J. |
Ventak AV |
3 |
70 |
m |
CAD |
SMVT |
CCS |
35% |
III |
20 J. |
Ventak AV |
4 |
68 |
m |
CAD |
SMVT |
AFib |
29% |
III |
3 J. |
Ventak AV II |
5 |
61 |
m |
CAD |
SMVT |
AFib |
45% |
II |
10 J. |
Ventak AV II |
6 |
71 |
m |
CAD |
VF |
AV I |
40% |
I |
9 J. |
Ventak AV II |
7 |
64 |
m |
CAD |
SMVT |
AFib |
45% |
III |
5 J. |
Ventak AV II |
8 |
60 |
m |
DCM |
VF |
AV I |
35% |
II |
12 J. |
Ventak AV II |
9 |
67 |
f |
CAD |
VF |
– |
20% |
III |
6 J. |
Ventak AV II |
10 |
65 |
f |
CAD |
SMVT |
– |
60% |
I |
11 J. |
Ventak AV II |
11 |
74 |
m |
CAD |
SMVT |
AV II |
60% |
II |
5 J. |
Ventak AV II |
12 |
62 |
m |
CAD |
SMVT |
– |
55% |
II |
7 J. |
Ventak AV III |
13 |
67 |
m |
CAD |
SMVT |
AV I |
78% |
I |
5 J. |
Ventak AV II |
14 |
55 |
m |
CAD |
SMVT |
AV I |
54% |
II |
7 J. |
Ventak AV III |
15 |
68 |
f |
CAD |
VF |
AV I |
19% |
III |
17 J. |
Ventak AV II |
16 |
55 |
m |
CAD |
SMVT |
AV I |
41% |
II |
9 J. |
Ventak AV III |
17 |
61 |
m |
CAD |
VF |
Afib |
51% |
I |
12 J. |
Ventak AV III |
18 |
77 |
m |
CAD |
VF |
AV I |
55% |
I |
11 J. |
Ventak AV III |
19 |
63 |
f |
CAD |
SMVT |
Afib |
60% |
I |
7 J. |
Ventak AV III |
20 |
68 |
m |
CAD |
SMVT |
Afib |
65% |
I |
10 J. |
Ventak AV III |
21 |
49 |
m |
CAD |
VF |
AV III |
47% |
II |
3 J. |
Ventak AV III |
22 |
79 |
f |
CAD |
SMVT |
AV I |
40% |
I |
14 J. |
Ventak AV II |
23 |
79 |
f |
CAD |
SMVT |
Afib |
54% |
II |
3 J. |
Ventak AV III |
24 |
62 |
m |
CAD |
SMVT |
Afib |
65% |
I |
15 J. |
Ventak AV III |
25 |
57 |
m |
CAD |
SMVT |
Afib |
70% |
I |
10 J. |
Ventak AV III |
26 |
75 |
m |
DCM |
VF |
Afib |
28% |
II |
9 J. |
Ventak AV II |
27 |
66 |
m |
CAD |
SMVT |
Afib |
27% |
III |
3 J. |
Ventak AV II |